Deterministic Simulator

One infrastructure. Two readings of instability.

OpenProof does not claim truth. It structures what can be made readable, reconstructible, and verifiable at Moment T. The same sealed logic can be used in two ways: to defend a decision under scrutiny, or to detect organizational instability before crisis becomes visible.

Core: sealed JSON + human-readable preview + public hash Method: deterministic · no AI · no interpretation Output: RPO = Registered Probative Object

Open Crisis Mode Open Signal Mode

Crisis Mode is for litigation, audit, and decision defense. Signal Mode is for organizational readability, instability detection, and structural prevention. In both cases, the hash proves integrity over time, not “truth”.

Choose your reading

Same deterministic core · different institutional use

Mode 01 High urgency

Crisis Mode

Use this reading when a decision is already exposed, contested, or likely to be challenged. The objective is not analysis for its own sake. The objective is to determine whether the decision can be reconstructed and defended under scrutiny.

Litigation readiness · audit exposure · governance pressure · executive accountability

Outputs: coverage, defensibility, institutional exposure, escalation path, sealed RPO

Buyers: DRH · DG · Legal · COMEX · crisis cabinets

Question answered

Can this decision withstand legal, institutional, or executive scrutiny?

Primary promise

Protect what can be defended before it becomes a liability.

Enter Crisis Mode

Mode 02 Prevention layer

Signal Mode

Use this reading when the organization still functions on the surface, but something is drifting underneath. The objective is not to score people. The objective is to determine where the structure becomes unreadable, unstable, or friction-heavy before failure becomes visible.

Instability detection · turnover friction · leadership drift · decision-chain misalignment

Outputs: interpretive coherence, ESI, structural exposure, stabilization path, sealed RPO

Buyers: DRH · COMEX · transformation · governance leaders

Question answered

Where is organizational readability degrading before crisis becomes visible?

Primary promise

Restore structural readability before instability hardens into crisis.

Enter Signal Mode

What remains identical

Infrastructure logic

The simulator does not switch to a different ontology when you change mode. It keeps the same core discipline: sealed structure, readable preview, public hash, deterministic scoring rules, and human accountability.

What changes is the institutional reading: defense under pressure versus prevention before breakdown. That distinction is the product architecture.

Invariant 01

No AI decisioning

Invariant 02

No interpretation claims

Invariant 03

Public hash for integrity

Invariant 04

RPO as opposable structure

The simulator is not the product itself. It is the visible edge of a broader ProofOps logic: integrity, readability, verifiability, and institutional accountability.

Request a Pilot

Spec · Crisis Mode · Signal Mode